When keen-eyed developers first encounter WebAssembly (or Wasm, for short), a common question arises: How is WebAssembly different than the Java Virtual Machine (JVM)? It’s an excellent question—both technologies boil down to the same fundamental promise: a portable bytecode designed to “write once, run anywhere.” While they share a core foundation, their approaches and goals differ vastly. Exploring these distinctions reveals why both remain as separate, important projects with their own ecosystems.
Conceptual differences
At their core, both the JVM and WebAssembly were designed to run compiled code just about anywhere—for the JVM, this meant machines with different operating systems or CPU architectures, something unprecedented for its time, and for WebAssembly, this meant any web browser on any computer anywhere, for the rest of time.
The JVM, introduced in the mid-1990s alongside Java, evolved into a full-fledged platform providing rich runtime support—garbage collection, extensive standard libraries, and tools for managed execution. However, some might say this gives the JVM a considerable amount of bloat: large memory footprints and slower startup times. While extremely powerful, this makes the JVM less suitable for lightweight applications.
In contrast, WebAssembly was designed with the web in mind—specifically for running code inside browsers. As a result, it was architected to prioritize a lightweight runtime and lightning-fast startup times, but without the rich runtime support. Only targeting browsers would make Wasm less portable than Java bytecode, but today, standalone Wasm runtimes can run outside the web, opening new doors for server-side applications, embedded systems, and edge computing. Additionally, some limited additional runtime support is coming to WebAssembly, namely, garbage collection, but we’re unlikely to see the full breadth of runtime support in WebAssembly that the JVM offers.
Interoperability
The JVM only works with its family of languages—Java, Kotlin, Scala, and a few more—all of which are intentionally designed to run atop the JVM. While the Java ecosystem has extensive libraries and frameworks, interoperability only happens between these JVM languages. JVM-based applications can call out to native code, but not without great effort and care.
WebAssembly wasn’t designed to only support one programming language or to favor a certain style of language, whether functional, garbage-collected, or interpreted. Any language—Rust, JavaScript, Python, C++—could be compiled to run on a Wasm runtime. While that doesn’t mean that code from each of these languages would be able to talk to each other right now, through the emerging Component Model standard, developers are able to take multiple Wasm modules written in different languages and connect them seamlessly. Soon, for WebAssembly, linking and interoperability will be a given.
Embeddability
When was the last time you heard that someone embedded the JVM into an application to run plugins or custom logic? Not recently, if ever, was it? While the JVM is powerful, it’s notoriously challenging to embed into other applications. Some high-profile embeddings have happened (like Java applets in browsers) but they have largely fallen off because of their clunkiness or maintainability.
WebAssembly, on the other hand, is designed for embeddability. Embedding a Wasm runtime in an application is often as easy as pulling in a new library. Once that’s done, your application can run Wasm code—this could be to extend a game engine, modify an algorithm, respond to an event, or anything else you could dream up. Wasm provides versatility in embeddability that the JVM isn’t equipped to offer (or wants to offer, for that matter).
Security
This is arguably where WebAssembly shines the brightest. The JVM has its own security model, but it was designed under the assumption that code being executed is trusted. WebAssembly fundamentally rejects that premise—born in the browser, where visiting a website necessarily downloads untrusted code and runs it, Wasm employs a strict deny-by-default sandbox model. It doesn’t grant code access to system resources, memory, or other functionality unless explicitly authorized. This approach inherently minimizes attack surfaces and makes Wasm ideal for environments where untrusted code execution is a concern.
The JVM’s security model is functional, but it just wasn’t designed for the level of security that Wasm offers.
Maturity and community
The JVM is a seasoned veteran in the tech world. With decades of history under its belt, it’s backed by tremendous adoption, extensive enterprise tooling, and a community so vast that it feels like an immovable force in software development—we know it’s not going away any time soon. If longevity and proven stability are key for your use cases, the JVM delivers.
WebAssembly, meanwhile, is still the new kid on the block. Despite being younger and just shy of its 10th birthday, the enthusiasm surrounding Wasm is growing at an exponential rate. Though less mature than the JVM today, WebAssembly’s trajectory suggests a bright future.
Conclusion
Both WebAssembly and the JVM are incredible technologies, each excelling in ways that suit their environments and use cases. The JVM thrives in enterprise workflows where full-blown applications and rich runtime capabilities matter. On the other hand, Wasm’s embeddability, lightweight runtime, cross-language compatibility, and unparalleled security make it a compelling choice for plugins and edge computing.
So, which should you choose? If you’re developing standalone applications with robust runtime needs, the JVM remains a practical and time-tested choice. But if you want flexibility across languages or the ability to plug into existing apps with ease, WebAssembly might just tip the scales.
About the Author
Related Blog Posts
At the Intersection of Operational Data and Generative AI
Help your organization understand the impact of generative AI (GenAI) on its operational data practices, and learn how to better align GenAI technology adoption timelines with existing budgets, practices, and cultures.
Using AI for IT Automation Security
Learn how artificial intelligence and machine learning aid in mitigating cybersecurity threats to your IT automation processes.
The Commodification of Cloud
Public cloud is no longer the bright new shiny toy, but it paved the way for XaaS, Edge, and a new cycle of innovation.
Most Exciting Tech Trend in 2022: IT/OT Convergence
The line between operation and digital systems continues to blur as homes and businesses increase their reliance on connected devices, accelerating the convergence of IT and OT. While this trend of integration brings excitement, it also presents its own challenges and concerns to be considered.
Adaptive Applications are Data-Driven
There's a big difference between knowing something's wrong and knowing what to do about it. Only after monitoring the right elements can we discern the health of a user experience, deriving from the analysis of those measurements the relationships and patterns that can be inferred. Ultimately, the automation that will give rise to truly adaptive applications is based on measurements and our understanding of them.
Inserting App Services into Shifting App Architectures
Application architectures have evolved several times since the early days of computing, and it is no longer optimal to rely solely on a single, known data path to insert application services. Furthermore, because many of the emerging data paths are not as suitable for a proxy-based platform, we must look to the other potential points of insertion possible to scale and secure modern applications.