BLOG | OFFICE OF THE CTO

AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: Understanding the Difference

Lori MacVittie Thumbnail
Lori MacVittie
Published March 24, 2025

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence has introduced a flurry of terms that often get conflated, misused, or simply misunderstood. Among these are AI agents and agentic AI. These terms may sound similar but refer to fundamentally different approaches to automation and intelligence. While both are designed to act on behalf of users, the distinction lies in their autonomy, adaptability, and operational scope. Let’s break it down.

AI Agents: Task-oriented automation

AI agents are rule-driven systems designed to execute specific tasks based on predefined inputs and objectives. These agents operate within a controlled environment, often functioning as extensions of existing software or workflows. Think of them as AI-powered assistants that can handle automation but are ultimately limited by predefined rules and parameters.

For example:

  • A chatbot responding to customer inquiries based on scripted responses.
  • An AI-driven security system that flags anomalous behavior based on preset rules.
  • A network automation tool that applies security patches based on predefined schedules.

AI agents do not self-improve beyond their training data and cannot dynamically adjust their behavior beyond their encoded logic. They excel at efficiency, but they lack the ability to make decisions beyond their programmed scope.

Agentic AI: Autonomy and adaptive decision making

Agentic AI takes automation a step further by introducing autonomy and contextual adaptation. Unlike AI agents, agentic AI is designed to perceive, reason, and act independently. It doesn’t just follow instructions; it can dynamically determine the best course of action based on its environment.

Key characteristics of agentic AI include:

  • Self-learning capabilities, allowing it to improve over time.
  • Situational awareness, enabling it to react to unexpected conditions.
  • Goal-seeking behavior, meaning it can redefine its own actions to optimize outcomes.

For example:

  • A cybersecurity AI that actively adjusts security rules in real time based on evolving attack patterns rather than following pre-set rules.
  • An autonomous IT operations AI that detects inefficiencies in network configurations and applies optimizations without human intervention.
  • An AI-driven application delivery system that dynamically reroutes traffic based on predictive performance modeling.

Unlike traditional AI agents, agentic AI doesn’t just react—it anticipates, adapts, and strategizes. It moves beyond basic automation to a more dynamic, problem-solving entity.

Why the difference matters

As enterprises accelerate their adoption of AI-driven automation, understanding the distinction between AI agents and agentic AI is critical. AI agents are perfect for repetitive, rule-based tasks that require predictability and control, while agentic AI is better suited for environments that demand adaptability, resilience, and autonomous decision making.

For organizations focused on network security, application delivery, and IT automation, the shift toward agentic AI represents a fundamental leap forward. While AI agents help reduce human workload by handling predefined tasks, agentic AI enables proactive, real-time decision making that enhances efficiency, security, and performance at scale.

The future: A hybrid approach?

Rather than a binary choice, the future likely involves a hybrid approach (surprised?) where AI agents and agentic AI work in tandem. AI agents handle the predictable, repeatable tasks, while agentic AI dynamically adapts to emerging challenges and opportunities.

For organizations looking to scale automation beyond scripts and rules, understanding the difference between these AI models isn’t just an academic exercise; it’s a roadmap for the future of AIOps.